Domains / Immunology
Domain 02 · 1 dossier

Immunology

CD19 CAR-T can reset the immune system in lupus — sometimes durably, sometimes not. The difference between remission and relapse is not the construct alone; it's whether the therapy clears the sanctuaries and resets reconstitution.

Independently audited 0 fabricated citations
immunology · figure
Durable immune reset
DOSSIER

Durable Immune Reset in Autoimmune Cell Therapy

Durable remission versus relapse is driven by three coupled forces — Persistence × Sanctuary × Reconstitution — read across CD19/BCMA CAR-T, CAR-Treg, CAR-NK and in-vivo CAR, over six autoimmune indications.
  • DOSSIEROne framework across SLE, myasthenia gravis, NMOSD, systemic sclerosis, myositis and type 1 diabetes.
  • WORKBOOK24 sheets — our most extensive. 90 claims with verbatim excerpts; 248 itemized exclusions; safety (CRS/ICANS/secondary malignancy).
  • AUDITRelease-ready · grounded. Every premise re-verified against source, zero retractions.
  • HYPOTHESES11 falsifiable, dated; a precision finding on early durability (YTB323 cohort).
$4,000 / one-time · single · $12,000 site · yours to keep
Durable immune reset
Remission vs relapse
Quantitative anchors
The actual contents — no fluff

Exactly what's inside Durable Immune Reset in Autoimmune Cell Therapy.

The full research-report table of contents and every one of the 24 tables in the evidence workbook — the real structure of what you license, not a teaser.

Research report29 sections
  1. Report Scope & Evidence Integrity Statement
  2. Claim Boundary & FDA-Category Discipline
  3. 2026 Translational Signal Update & Evidence Refresh Addendum
  4. Executive Summary
  5. Decision Snapshot
  6. Buyer Decision Cheat Sheet (by platform AND indication)
  7. Source Quality Dashboard
  8. The Persistence × Sanctuary × Reconstitution Model
  9. Platform Comparison & Evidence Maturity Matrix (modality-level)
  10. Relapse-Mode Convergence Map
  11. Key Findings & Quantitative Evidence
  12. Mechanistic Insights
  13. Safety: CRS, ICANS, Infection, Secondary Malignancy, Cytopenia, GvHD
  14. Durability & Indication Gradient
  15. Persistence & Antigen Dynamics
  16. Manufacturing, Scalability & CMC
  17. Regulatory Pathway & Classification
  18. Indication-Specific Deep Dives
  19. Oncology ↔ Autoimmune Cross-Domain Translation
  20. Prioritized Non-Obvious Hypotheses (2026–2028)
  21. Most Valuable Next Studies / Validation Strategies
  22. Validation & Falsification Gate Map
  23. Company / Platform / Funding Landscape
  24. Commercial & Market Access
  25. Strategic Recommendations
  26. Final Judgment
  27. Expert Review & Validation Attestation
  28. Appendix
  29. References
Evidence workbook24 tables
Workbook Guide9 rows+

An orientation to the workbook — its scope, how the claim counts reconcile, and the audit posture.

Claim Ledger91 rows+

Every factual claim in the report, independently re-verified against its primary source, each carrying a support verdict and a recalibrated evidence grade.

Evidence Table134 rows+

The full registry of cited sources — PMIDs, NCTs and DOIs — with metadata, resolved live against the primary record.

Source Support Verdicts91 rows+

The verbatim source excerpt behind each claim, with an independent verdict on whether the source actually supports it.

Source Quality Summary19 rows+

A reconciled view of source quality across the evidence base, with the grading rationale.

Platform Scorecard9 rows+

Programs or modalities scored on the framework's axes — a structured, side-by-side comparison (expert, ordinal, non-evidentiary).

In this dossier: Ordinal maturity 0-4 = expert/non-evidentiary; does not drive standalone efficacy claims (Immunology §2A).

Indication Scorecard10 rows+

Programs or modalities scored on the framework's axes — a structured, side-by-side comparison (expert, ordinal, non-evidentiary).

PSR Scorecard5 rows+

Programs or modalities scored on the framework's axes — a structured, side-by-side comparison (expert, ordinal, non-evidentiary).

Figure Source Map20 rows+

The provenance of every figure — its underlying data and how it was produced.

Figure Attempt Ledger21 rows+

The provenance of every figure — its underlying data and how it was produced.

In this dossier: All figures RENDERED — none PENDING (source artifact had 14 PENDING).

Hypotheses Ledger12 rows+

The forward-looking, falsifiable hypotheses — each with a predicted readout and an explicit disconfirming test.

Most Valuable Next Studies10 rows+

The highest-leverage experiments to run next, prioritized — a ready-made research agenda.

Validation-Falsification Gat9 rows+

A structured table within the evidence workbook.

In this dossier: 13 Validation-Falsification Gates

Safety Tracker10 rows+

A structured tracker of the programs, signals and evidence in this dimension of the analysis.

Manufacturing-CMC Matrix7 rows+

A structured map across this dimension of the analysis.

Biomarker-Endpoint Tracker8 rows+

How candidate biomarkers map to clinical endpoints — the bridge from a measurement to an outcome.

Regulatory Tracker8 rows+

Regulatory designations and pathways relevant to each program — noting that a designation is never an approval.

Company-Platform-Funding18 rows+

A structured table within the evidence workbook.

Trial-Registry Tracker28 rows+

A structured tracker of the programs, signals and evidence in this dimension of the analysis.

In this dossier: All NCTs opened & confirmed on ClinicalTrials.gov v2 (2026-06-04).

External 2026 Update Sources14 rows+

A structured table within the evidence workbook.

In this dossier: Gate G2 — new 2026 forward search + IR/news/regulatory sweep; search date 2026-06-04.

Expert Review-Validation11 rows+

A structured table within the evidence workbook.

In this dossier: Attestation item

Gate Compliance Ledger10 rows+

A structured table within the evidence workbook.

Excluded Claims249 rows+

Every claim we considered and removed, with the reason — showing the work, including what didn't make the cut.

In this dossier: 246 excluded claims; 11 recovered to body + 20 to premises; remainder excluded with reason. Reconciles 89+246=335.

Salvage Ledger12 rows+

Claims recovered from the excluded set after deeper verification.

In this dossier: Original section

Click any table to see what it is.

Inside the workbook

Different buyers live in different tabs.

Click a buyer to see exactly what they get.

+
Investors / VC
Trial & Catalyst Tracker
Dated 2026–2028 readouts — sponsor, phase, indication, and the catalyst that moves the thesis. A calendar you can underwrite against, with safety-signal and regulatory trackers.
+
Founders / R&D
Hypotheses + Next Studies
Falsifiable, dated hypotheses and the most-valuable next experiments — a prioritized research agenda, each with the readout that would prove it wrong.
+
Strategy / BD
Framework Scorecards
Every platform scored on the framework's axes, plus a biomarker-to-endpoint map — where each program wins, loses, and is mispriced.
+
Diligence
Claim Ledger + Verdicts
Every audited claim with an independent support verdict and a verbatim source excerpt; sources resolved live; a dated verification & search log. Built to survive scrutiny.
+
Everyone
What we cut, and why
Excluded-claim dispositions — every claim we considered and removed, with the reason. Showing the work, including what didn't make the cut.
The guarantee

Every claim resolves to a primary source.

This dossier ships with its independent diligence audit. Evidence is labelled Established / Inferred / Hypothesis. A surrogate is never equated with outcome; a designation is never an approval.

Zemi Research publishes independent, pre-packaged research reports delivered as digital downloads (PDF + spreadsheet). These are information products — not medical, clinical, investment, legal, or professional advice; not a consulting, advisory, or regulated service; and they create no professional-client relationship. Provided for general informational use by industry professionals.